TR-05 · our practice ref · our-reading

Set the review and re-baseline trigger

Practice TR-05 in the Transition and evidence group. The basis is our-reading, and the row asks for 3 pieces of evidence.

At a glance

Ref: TR-05
Process: Transition and evidence
Basis: our-reading
Source: ISO catalogue record, stage 50.00
Evidence: 3 items
Gaps: 2 common

Evidence to keep

Transition and evidenceThe review date and the owner
Transition and evidenceThe stage-change trigger and who watches it
Transition and evidenceThe re-baseline record from the last review

Questions before you sign

When is the next review?
Who watches the ISO stage?
What did the last re-baseline change?

The practice, in our words

Set the date and the trigger for reviewing the transition and re-baselining the file against the published text. The public record shows the draft at stage 50.00 with no publication date, so the trigger cannot be a date alone.

What it means in a VSE

Use two triggers: the ISO stage change, and a calendar date. When either fires, re-read the published text if it exists, compare it with the register, and record what changed. The change watch on this site exists to fire the first trigger.

In a firm of 25 people or fewer, set the review and re-baseline trigger has to earn its time. The test for TR-05 is not whether the team understands it but whether the artefact exists at the end of the project. Shrink the meeting. Shrink the document. Keep the record.

How to evidence it

Attach the artefacts above to the Set the review and re-baseline trigger row with the project name, the owner and the date. The anchor for TR-05 is The review date and the owner. A named person must produce it on request.

For TR-05, the reviewer will sample one live decision and ask for The stage-change trigger and who watches it. No artefact, no evidence. A file that depends on one person's mailbox is not a file for set the review and re-baseline trigger.

What an assessor samples

An assessor reads the set the review and re-baseline trigger practice, asks for its evidence and tests one project against it. For TR-05, the useful sample is the most recent project that used the practice, not the best one. A reconstruction written for the visit is a finding for TR-05 if the practice cannot be shown to have happened when it mattered.

Common gaps

A review date with no owner
The file re-baselined against a draft that was never published

What changes from the 2019 report. For TR-05, the draft replaces a Technical Report. The transition work is to compare, re-baseline, retrain and keep the review trigger alive, whether or not the published text changes a particular sentence.

Where the draft fits

The public abstract places set the review and re-baseline trigger inside one of the four processes the Intermediate profile covers. For TR-05, the draft clause numbering and wording are not public, so this page cites ISO catalogue record, stage 50.00 and does not quote the draft. The basis label for TR-05 says whether the practice is stated in the public record, named as a process in the series, or our reading.

Related practices

Source for this page: ISO catalogue record, stage 50.00. Open the record and compare it with the TR-05 statement above. Retrieved 2026-10-22.